What is Constructive Dismissal in New Zealand?

 

Constructive Dismissal happens when an employer’s actions or inactions make working intolerable for an employee, pushing them to resign. Examples of conduct that amounts to constructive dismissal include:

 

 

 

 

Examples of Constructive Dismissal Cases ↗

 

The employer’s course of conduct need not intend to cause resignation; instead, the Employment Relations Authority asks the following:

 

 

 

Proving Constructive Dismissal Legal Test in NZ ↗

 

For example, it’s been previously found that a substantial rearrangement of job responsibilities or even high levels of workplace harassment can amount to constructive dismissal. The cause for resignation does not have to be a single event, either, with the Court finding that a series of actions towards the employer can amount to constructive dismissal. The key to all good constructive dismissal claims is solid evidence.

 


 

Examples of Constructive Dismissal Cases

 

The following are fictionalised examples of constructive dismissal cases. If you feel that you may have a case, do not resign; seek legal advice. Call our toll-free employment hotline and let our team of employment law specialists at Sacked Kiwi help.

 

Saving Face: Resignation or Dismissal Ultimatums

 

Where an employee is given the ultimatum between being dismissed or resigning, the Employment Relations Authority has found that to be clear, constructive dismissal.

 

Case Example:

Sarah worked at a manufacturing company for over ten years, consistently receiving positive feedback. After a management shift, her new boss cited an unexplained “lack of motivation” and suggested she either resign or face dismissal. Feeling cornered, Sarah resigned to avoid the embarrassment of termination. When she sought legal advice with Sacked Kiwi, the ERA determined her resignation was, in effect, a constructive dismissal. The company’s pressure tactics and lack of performance evidence were seen as forcing her hand.

 

Significant Changes in Job Responsibilities

 

Where an employer significantly changes the responsibilities of a role without proper consultation or process that significantly impacts the number of hours an employee works or amounts to major changes to the duties of the role, courts have found constructive dismissal.

 

Case Example:

 

Jacob was a project manager at a design firm, managing a team and overseeing client accounts. One day, his employer decided to reassign him to a role that involved basic administrative tasks, with no team or client interaction, claiming “company restructuring.” He was also expected to work double his usual hours. The drastic change, without any warning or agreement, left Jacob feeling degraded and undervalued. Upon seeking legal advice through Sacked Kiwi, Jacob’s case was deemed constructive dismissal due to the employer’s failure to consult on major role changes properly.

 

Suggestions of Dishonesty When Money is Missing

 

If an employer accuses an employee of dishonesty when money goes missing without conducting a fair and thorough investigation, this can amount to constructive dismissal.

 

Case Example:

Alicia worked in a mechanics shop. One day, $100 dollars goes missing from the owner’s office. At lunch break later that day, the owner heavily implies that Alicia stole the money, going so far as to suggest that her new earrings, a gift from her mother, were bought with the money. Humiliated and annoyed, Alicia seeks advice from Sacked Kiwi before resigning. After filing a personal grievance, the ERA ruled this as constructive dismissal and awarded damages.

 

Inconsistent Payments of Wages

Employers must pay employees correctly and on time. Repeated failure to meet wage commitments can justify constructive dismissal.

 

Case Example:

Tom worked as a chef at a restaurant that frequently delayed his paychecks and occasionally paid him less than agreed upon, claiming cash flow issues. When Tom questioned his wages, the owner would brush him off, insisting he should be “grateful for the opportunity.” Frustrated and struggling to meet his financial obligations, Tom resigned and filed a complaint with Sacked Kiwi. The ERA ruled this as constructive dismissal, as the employer’s inability to pay him consistently created a hostile environment and breached Tom’s basic employment rights.

 

Repeated Serious Harassment

 

Persistent harassment by colleagues or supervisors, if not addressed by the employer, can result in constructive dismissal claims.

 

Case Example:

Priya worked in an office environment where a senior colleague constantly made inappropriate comments about her background and appearance. Despite multiple complaints to HR, no action was taken. Priya felt isolated and disrespected, leading her to experience stress and anxiety. When she ultimately resigned with Sacked Kiwi’s help, the ERA reviewed her case and determined the employer’s inaction on her harassment claims constituted constructive dismissal, as it left her with no choice but to leave.

 

Resonate with one of the examples? Get in touch with our team of employment law experts before you resign. Call our toll-free employment hotline!

 


Legal Process for Filing a Constructive Dismissal Claim

 

Step 1: Documenting Incidents and Evidence

Start by gathering all relevant documentation that showcases a hostile or intolerable work environment. Emails, meeting notes, and any formal complaints made to HR or management should be carefully organized to support your claim.

 

Step 2: Contacting Sacked Kiwi

Reach out to Sacked Kiwi’s employment advocates for guidance. Their no-win, no-fee service provides expert support through the grievance process, helping you navigate legal complexities and strengthen your case.

 

Free Employment Advice from Employment Law Experts ↗

 

Step 3: Filing a Formal Claim

With Sacked Kiwi’s support, you can file a formal claim with the Employment Relations Authority (ERA). This involves presenting your documented evidence and demonstrating how your work conditions forced you to resign, establishing grounds for constructive dismissal.

 

Start your Employment Justice Journey ↗

 


 

How to Gather Evidence for a Constructive Dismissal Case

 

If you’re considering a constructive dismissal claim, gathering solid evidence is essential for a strong case. Constructive dismissal in New Zealand requires a clear record showing that unresolved issues and a toxic work environment left you no choice but to resign. By documenting emails, meeting notes, and official complaints, you’ll build a compelling paper trail to support your claim with the Employment Relations Authority. Here’s how to collect and organize the evidence you need to make your constructive dismissal case in New Zealand as strong as possible.

 

Remember before you resign always seek legal advice. Our employment law experts are waiting to help you with your case on our toll-free hotline.

 

Best Practices for Documentation

Learn more about documentation ↗

 


 

Proving Constructive Dismissal Legal Tests in NZ

 

Key Elements of a Constructive Dismissal Claim

 

The core legal test to a successful claim of constructive dismissal is twofold:

 

 

 

 

This was set out in Auckland Electric Power Board v Auckland Provincial District Local Officers IUOW by the Court of Appeal. These core legal elements have exceptions and qualifications for different circumstances, which is why advice to prove constructive dismissal in New Zealand legal advice is so important. Operating for over 10 years in New Zealand our team of employment law experts are ready to help you.

 

Learn more about our team of experts ↗

 


 

Compensation for Constructive Dismissal: What to Expect

 

In constructive dismissal cases, the Employment Relations Authority (ERA) evaluates compensation based on the circumstances and impacts of the dismissal, aiming to provide fair redress for the losses and hardship endured by the employee. Often, parties may reach a settlement before, during, or even after mediation, potentially avoiding a full ERA hearing.

 

Learn more about the personal grievance process ↗

 

Types of Compensation Available in New Zealand

In New Zealand, compensation for constructive dismissal may include:

 

 

 

 

 

These types of compensation are awarded on a case-by-case basis, with the ERA evaluating each claim individually to address unique circumstances.

 

Factors Affecting Compensation Amount

Compensation are be influenced by various factors, such as:

 

 

 

 

 

Whether through settlement during mediation or by the ERA’s decision, constructive dismissal claims aim to achieve a fair resolution for affected employees.

 


 

How Sacked Kiwi Can Help with Constructive Dismissal Claims

 

We’re dedicated to uncovering the full story behind employment disputes. Our team will thoroughly investigate your situation, represent you in mediation, and provide the guidance and support you need during this challenging time. We understand that being out of work can be overwhelming, so we offer a no-win, no-fee service, covering any costs until your case is resolved.

 

If you believe you’ve experienced constructive dismissal, reach out to us for a free consultation as soon as possible.

 

Additional resources and information on available support can be found here.

 


 

FAQs on Constructive Dismissal in New Zealand

 

How long do I have to file a claim?

In New Zealand, constructive dismissal claims must be filed with the Employment Relations Authority (ERA) within 90 days of your resignation. Acting promptly ensures you remain within the legal timeframe to pursue a grievance, so contact an employment advocate or legal professional as soon as possible to initiate your claim.

 

Learn more about the personal grievance process ↗

 

Have any other questions?

 

Learn more about employment law on our learning hub ↗

Alternatively, get in touch with our team of experts on our toll-free employment law hotline

 

 


Legal Disclaimer

The content posted on the Sacked Kiwis website should not be considered or relied upon as legal advice or opinion. The information we present here is not intended to serve as legal guidance. Over time, laws and regulations evolve, potentially altering the accuracy of previously shared information. Updates in jurisprudence or legislation (for example, changes to the Employment Relations Act), which could happen without immediate notice, may render the legal information on this platform outdated or obsolete. Seeking legal advice is always advisable.

Should you need employment advice, please don’t hesitate to contact us.