Losing your job to redundancy can be a challenging experience, but what happens when you see your disestablished role re-advertised shortly afterward? Many employees in New Zealand find themselves questioning whether their redundancy was justified. Understanding your rights in these situations is vital for protecting your career and seeking fair treatment under employment law.
Understanding Redundancy in New Zealand Employment Law
Redundancy occurs when an employer decides that a specific role is no longer needed, often due to restructuring or financial constraints. While redundancies are permissible under New Zealand law, they must be carried out in good faith, with genuine justification, and through a fair process.
For employees, the critical question is often: Was my redundancy genuine, or was it a way to replace me without following proper procedures? The re-advertisement of a disestablished role raises serious concerns and may suggest that the redundancy was not legitimate.
Your Rights When Facing Redundancy
If your role is made redundant, you have rights under New Zealand employment law, including:
- Fair Process: Your employer must consult with you, provide a legitimate reason for the redundancy, and consider your input.
- Good Faith Obligations: Employers are required to act honestly, transparently, and fairly during the redundancy process.
- Redundancy Pay: Depending on your employment agreement, you may be entitled to redundancy compensation.
If these rights are not upheld, you may have grounds for a legal challenge.
The Legal Gray Area: Re-advertising a Redundant Role
New Zealand law does not explicitly state how long an employer must wait before re-advertising a role that has been made redundant. This creates uncertainty, especially for employees who feel misled by the redundancy process.
The case of Roger Teague v Pyroclassic Fires Limited [2023] NZERA 11 highlights this issue. In this case, an employee’s role was disestablished, but the employer re-advertised the same role shortly afterward. The Employment Relations Authority (ERA) allowed the employee’s claim to proceed despite the usual 90-day limitation for unjustifiable dismissal claims.
This decision underscores a crucial point: the timing and justification of redundancy matters. Employers must be able to demonstrate that the redundancy was genuinely necessary, especially if the same role is later advertised again.
Case Study: Teague v Pyroclassic Fires
One case that has brought this issue into focus is Roger Teague v Pyroclassic Fires Limited [2023] NZERA 11, where the Employment Relations Authority (ERA) allowed an unjustifiable dismissal claim to proceed despite the fact that the 90-day limitation period for filing such claims had elapsed. In this case, the employee’s position had been disestablished due to redundancy, but the employer soon re-advertised the same role. This advertisement came to the attention of the employee after the 90-day period for lodging a claim had passed, raising the question of whether the redundancy was truly justified.
The ERA’s decision to allow the claim to proceed was based on the caveat that the employee had not been aware of the re-advertisement until after the 90-day limitation period had expired. This development presented a compelling reason to consider the case on its merits, even though the strict time limit for filing unjustifiable dismissal claims had passed. The case underscores a critical gap in the law: while there is no express requirement for an employer to recontact an employee whose position has been disestablished, neither is there clear guidance on whether the re-advertisement of the position within a short time frame might indicate that the redundancy itself was not legitimate.
For many businesses, the act of disestablishing a role is a necessary step in restructuring, but the simultaneous readvertisement of the same role can raise questions about the bona fides of the redundancy process. Employers may be unaware of the potential legal risks involved in such decisions, particularly if they re-advertise a position soon after disestablishing it. Employees, on the other hand, may feel that the redundancy was not genuinely justified if they see their former role being filled by another candidate shortly thereafter.
From a legal standpoint, the absence of a clear statutory timeframe within which a business must wait before re-advertising a disestablished position creates uncertainty. If an employee is made redundant and the same position is re-advertised shortly after, they may have grounds to argue that the redundancy was not a genuine operational requirement, but rather an unjustified dismissal. However, without specific guidance from the law, this becomes a grey area, and each case is likely to be judged on its individual circumstances.
The lack of clarity in the law surrounding redundancies and re-advertisement raises important questions about employee rights and employer responsibilities. While cases like Teague v Pyroclassic Fires provide some insight, they also highlight the ongoing legal ambiguity. Until more definitive rules or precedents are established, both employers and employees must navigate this complex terrain with caution, understanding that the timing of re-advertising a role after redundancy could be a key factor in challenging the legitimacy of a redundancy decision.
What to Do if Your Redundant Role Is Re-advertised
If you find that your former position has been re-advertised shortly after your redundancy, you have options:
- Request an Explanation
- Ask your former employer why the role was re-advertised and whether any significant changes were made to its duties or responsibilities.
- Review Your Employment Agreement
- Check for any clauses related to redundancy or re-employment. Some agreements may specify conditions under which a role can be re-advertised.
- Gather Evidence
- Keep records of the redundancy process, including emails, consultation documents, and the job advertisement for the re-advertised role.
- Seek Legal Advice
- Contact a lawyer or advocate specializing in employment law. They can help you understand whether your redundancy may have been unjustified and guide you on next steps. Sacked Kiwi might be the right choice for you. We provide free employment law advice on our employment law hotline, if we think you have a case we may take you on under our No Win No Fee policy.
- File a Personal Grievance
- If you believe the redundancy was not genuine, you can file a personal grievance with the ERA. Keep in mind the 90-day limitation period, though exceptions may apply in cases like Teague v Pyroclassic Fires.
Signs Your Redundancy May Not Have Been Genuine
Employees may suspect their redundancy was unjustified if:
- The same role is re-advertised shortly after being disestablished.
- There was a lack of consultation or transparency during the redundancy process.
- Other employees in similar roles were not affected.
- The reason for redundancy (e.g., financial constraints) does not align with the company’s behavior, such as hiring for new roles.
Protecting Yourself During Redundancy
To safeguard your rights, it’s crucial to stay proactive during the redundancy process:
- Ask Questions: Don’t hesitate to request detailed explanations about why your role is being disestablished.
- Request Documentation: Ensure you receive written records of the redundancy process, including the employer’s reasoning.
- Know the Timelines: Be aware of the 90-day limitation for filing personal grievances and act promptly if you suspect unfair treatment.
Navigating Uncertainty in Employment Law
The lack of statutory guidance around redundancy and re-advertising creates challenges for employees and employers alike. Until clearer rules or precedents are established, employees must remain vigilant and informed about their rights.
FAQs
Can my employer re-advertise my role immediately after redundancy?
Yes, but the re-advertisement must not undermine the legitimacy of the redundancy. If you suspect the redundancy was not genuine, you may have grounds for a legal challenge.
What should I do if I suspect my redundancy was unfair?
Start by gathering evidence, reviewing your employment agreement, and seeking legal advice. You may also file a personal grievance within the 90-day period.
How long does my employer need to wait before re-advertising a redundant role?
There is no specific timeframe under New Zealand law, but re-advertising too soon can raise questions about the redundancy’s legitimacy.
What is a personal grievance?
A personal grievance is a formal claim employees can file if they believe they have been unfairly treated, such as through unjustified dismissal or redundancy.
Can I claim redundancy pay in New Zealand?
It depends on your employment agreement. Redundancy pay is not automatically required by law but may be included in your contract.
What evidence do I need to prove my redundancy was not genuine?
Keep records of communications during the redundancy process, consultation documents, and the re-advertised job description. These can support your claim.
Facing redundancy is never easy, especially when your former role is re-advertised shortly afterward. While New Zealand employment law does not provide clear-cut rules on this issue, cases like Teague v Pyroclassic Fires offer hope for employees who suspect their redundancy was unjustified. By staying informed, asking questions, and seeking legal advice, you can protect your rights and ensure you’re treated fairly in the workplace.
Legal Disclaimer
The content posted on the Sacked Kiwis website should not be considered or relied upon as legal advice or opinion. The information presented here is not intended to serve as legal guidance. Over time, laws and regulations evolve, potentially altering the accuracy of previously shared information. Updates in jurisprudence or legislation (for example, changes to the Employment Relations Act), which could happen without immediate notice, may render the legal information on this platform outdated or obsolete. Seeking legal advice is always advisable.
Should you need employment advice, please don’t hesitate to contact us through our toll-free hotline.
Further Reading
Rethinking Cooling Off Periods ↗
